Forum OpenACS Improvement Proposals (TIPs): Re: TIP #29: Tree_sortkey improvements for performance and concurrency on postgresql (seconded)

Collapse
4: Re: TIP #29: Tree_sortkey improvements for performance and concurrency on postgresql (seconded) (response to 2)
Posted by Malte Sussdorff on 11/14/03 04:08 PM
Seconded for both questions. Yes, it is acceptible and Yes, it should go in for 5.0.

Sadly nothing will be done til one week, due to the TIP process rules, as pointed out.

Collapse
5: Re: TIP #29: Tree_sortkey improvements for performance and concurrency on postgresql (seconded) (response to 4)
Posted by Jeff Davis on 11/14/03 06:10 PM
Well, if there are no NO votes I will go ahead and implement/test and just hold off for the week...
Collapse
6: Re: TIP #29: Tree_sortkey improvements for performance and concurrency on postgresql (seconded) (response to 5)
Posted by Tilmann Singer on 11/14/03 06:26 PM
No vetos you wanted to say, not no votes ... confusing the hell out of me ;).

If you can do this for 5.0, great!